On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jonathan Dieter (jdieter@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) > >> > >> I've updated this to build and posted at > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843250 > >> > >> If a package FTBFS and the current maintainer doesn't fix it, will we > >> have a chance to take ownership of it before it gets blocked? > > > > I'd suggest finding a willing provenpackager to help you fix it > > if you can't get the maintainer to apply or approve a comaintainership > > request. > > I'm a PP and I've helped with several of Lubo's pacakges in the past. > I'm willing to help with this if you like. That would be much appreciated, but it was meant to be more of a general question about what the procedure is for blocking FTBFS packages. Anyhow, if you're happy to apply the fix and Lubo doesn't mind, I sure won't complain. A number of my students love numptyphysics and I'd hate to see it lost. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
