Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:27:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> 
> I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have
> stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step.  Fixing.
> 
> But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get
> the package blocked?  I mean, besides that the code currently doesn't
> implement that.  Who would own hooking up that bit of pkgdb to that
> bit of the compose process?
> 
Dennis and I talked about this at FUDCon Blacksburg and Dennis outlined
a plan for doing it in fedpkg.  I think it's just waiting on enough time to
finish/start coding it.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpws4IrNLcF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux