Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/26/12 3:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:46 -0400
Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html

How is this list generated?  It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but
vbetool has been deadpackaged.

- ajax

http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/need-rebuild.py

did you follow the full eol procedure as defined
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
just making it dead.package in git is not enough.

I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step. Fixing.

But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get the package blocked? I mean, besides that the code currently doesn't implement that. Who would own hooking up that bit of pkgdb to that bit of the compose process?

- ajax

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux