Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > It would be nice to get rid of anything that's FTBFS in non supported
> > Fedora (ie at least < fc16) and the last time I looked at that there's
> > a good 150 odd packages that are fc15 or older packages. There's been
> > two mass rebuilds since then and if the package maintainers haven't
> > managed to fix them (or they've not been fixed by people like
> > secondary arches that fix them because they're blocking their builds)
> > the package maintainer is either AWOL or not doing their job of
> > maintaining packages or even bothering to check failure emails so it's
> > likely better off for Fedora that they're scrapped as well. I think in
> > the F17 cycle I fixed over 100+ of these packages.
> 
> I'll see about getting the list of other non-building packages and get
> bugs filed for them.

Done, new list sent.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux