Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Tom Lane (tgl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
> > > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
> > 
> > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build.
> > > [snip]
> > 
> > That list seems seriously incomplete.  I'm aware of at least these
> > others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced
> > by their release tags:
> 
> It's done by basing off of the F16FTBFS bug, as that's the easiest source
> of info when we haven't done a mass rebuild.
> 
> We could include everything with older dist tags. Looking at it, that would
> be 78 more packages.

... although for ones that are attached to F16FTBFS, the maintainers have
had open issues for over a year noting that their package didn't built. For
other packages, they may be less aware, and this would come as more of a
surprise to them.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux