Re: Accidental soname bump in libdbi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Last night I updated libdbi from 0.8.3 to 0.8.4, without paying much
> attention since a tarball diff showed that upstream hadn't done anything
> except update the configure script and supporting files.  However, this
> morning the broken-deps script whinged about it.  Looking more closely,
> it appears that the new script causes it to build "libdbi.so.1.0.0"
> instead of "libdbi.so.0.0.0".  Given that the upstream major version
> number has not changed, it seems to me this is bogus and the package
> should continue to use "0" as the soname major version.
>
> So I'll fix that later today.  If you got a broken-deps gripe for one
> of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild.

Whoops, just did Io-language.  Let me know when it's fixed, and I'll re-rebuild.

-J

>                         apologies, tom lane
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux