On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 21:18 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Paul Whalen <pwhalen@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > Good day all, > > Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status > meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are > posted below: > > Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-07-18/fedora-meeting-1.2012-07-18-20.00.html > Minutes (text): > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-07-18/fedora-meeting-1.2012-07-18-20.00.txt > Log: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-07-18/fedora-meeting-1.2012-07-18-20.00.log.html > > Paul > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > The minutes need a whole lot more detail: what was brought up; what > was voted - and what was the vote; what was passed; what failed. . . > I hate the internet when it comes to meetings; so much of the human > experience is missing, and because of this, so much business is > missing. The third link is a complete log, if you're that curious. The minutes linked to are automatically generated - basically, meetbot pulls out #topic, #agreed, #info and #action lines into the minutes. >From a quick scan, it looks like the answer to all of the questions 'what was voted - and what was the vote; what was passed; what failed...' is 'nothing'. Like many other of the smaller groups within Fedora, it looks like the ARM group rarely needs to go to the trouble of formal voting. QA is much the same. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
