Paul Wouters wrote: > On 07/12/2012 11:38 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > > So, this makes me wonder. Is there a good reason rpm doesn't check the > > new package and the old package for having the same file during an > > upgrade, and simply use the flags on the incoming package if they're > > both present? > > What if the incoming package accidentally remove the "noreplace"? You > wouldn't want to wipe out the existing configs in that case either. Perhaps the union of old flags and new flags should be used? > I think usually these cases fall under "unsupported". That's no excuse for not doing the right thing (provided that there is an objectively right thing to do). Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
