> The Original post was simply letting everyone know that upstream > changed their license. If you have an issue with that, they would be > the ones to address it, not anyone here in Fedora land. Technically, if upstream bungled its relicencing, Fedora has no grounds to redistribute under the new licence and is committing fencing (or something similar, I don't know the exact English term) That's why people are concerned here (both at this exact incident and at the approach advocated for packaging legal checks) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
