On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:58AM +0200, Ondrej Vasik wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:30 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:12:45PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > Am 10.07.2012 17:18, schrieb Orion Poplawski: > > > > Shouldn't that be /usr/ as well. Will it cause problems if it doesn't match > > > > with the /etc/passwd entry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, /etc/shells might be a problem... I would suggest: > > > > > > install the $shell in /usr/bin/$shell, Provide: /bin/$shell in the spec file and > > > add both paths in /etc/shell > > > > > > or we patch "chsh" and the like? > > > > > Adding both paths to /etc/shell sounds preferable to me. > > I can update the default /etc/shells shell paths to contain both paths > in setup package, however, other shell packages are modifying it too, so > it would be better to have some solution without need to involve dash, > zsh, tcsh, ksh and maybe other shell maintainers and need them to update > their packages because of the UsrMove changes. > Any ideas? /etc/shells.d :-? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
