Re: Licensing change: Audacious - GPLv3 --> BSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/10/2012 07:06 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 15:30 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 03:21 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>>> and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
>>>>> don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the proper parts of it,
>>> I don't think this is true.
>>
>> Agreed. It is my opinion that this is not the case, assuming that the
>> changes are substantial enough to be copyrightable.
>>
>> I'm otherwise refraining from comment on this thread, because it is
>> unclear as to whether translations are copyrightable or not.
> 
> Translated books are certainly copyrightable and have a separate
> copyright than the original, I do not see why translations of programs
> should not assuming entire phrases are translated and not single terms.

I'm not taking sides on this issue, merely pointing out that it is unclear.

~tom

==
Fedora Project


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux