On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > > Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ? > > I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote > -1 > There is a reason why those update policies exist: Fedora is no rolling > release :) I know, but I think this is a packaged that is not much used (quite new), most serious users will likely be reachable from the traffic-server-users mailinglist, and it's only two options that are not used by default that changes. > > * The update fixes serious bugs that many fedora users are > > encountering [Applies, fixes segfault] > How do you know. Are you getting many bug reports? I've hit the bug myself, and I know it's also been reported by others in the ATS issue tracker. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1276 I've not received any bugreports, and have actually never received any feedback from any users (adding weight to my assumption that there are very few users). > > If v3.0 is basically broken an upgrade is imho justified, else the cons seems > to overweight, especially the manual intervention for adjusting the config > files. v3.0 is still maintained, so the crash bug will likely be fixed. -jf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
