On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 21:48 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 06/26/2012 08:49 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > The preferred new way is that upstream implements the action in a way > > that is same across all distributions. Which, in some sense, does not > > answer your question. > > First and foremost how big of a problem do you guys believe this? > > Secondly cant we add the rule that packager are required to request > permission from fesco to follow what is suggested before they implement > it so it can be ensured that it's actually required/necessary for them > to do this and at the same time a list gets created and populated with > the relevant packages? Please no, please do not make Fedora and particularly FESCo a bureaucratic machinery. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel