On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 12:29 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > drago01 wrote: > > (empty dvd costs little to no more then a cd now days) > > FWIW, a CD-R90 actually costs more than a DVD-R or a DVD+R around here these > days. (It used to cost significantly less back in the day.) > > > So I'd just opt for not worrying about CDs anymore. The only real > > argument for CD sized images is download time but using Fedora without > > a proper internet connection is no fun anyway (updates) so not sure > > that matters either ... > > Download times are not the only reason for not going up to the full > (> 4 GiB) DVD size, though IMHO they are also a valid reason. There's also > the Multi Desktop Live DVD distributed by the ambassadors, which needs to > fit all the spins in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions on one dual-layer DVD. > So going up to 4 GiB per spin is a no go. > > Combined with your point above, this means we really need to allow arbitrary > target sizes, not just a list of maximum sizes of hardware media. I don't believe there's currently any requirement that target sizes match some form of physical media. So far they always _have_, but if there's a requirement that they _must_, I've never seen it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
