2012/6/20 Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Angus Salkeld <asalkeld@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: >>>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF >>>> > >>>> > Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future? >>>> > >>>> > According to what is written here >>>> > https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping >>>> > history function will likely be dropped. >>>> > >>>> > From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide >>>> > history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped? >>>> > >>>> >>>> Hi Michal, >>>> >>>> Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for >>>> dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not >>>> present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back >>>> in later. >>> >>>Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect >>>many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to >>>determine exactly what update caused a given problem. >> >> Maybe a "yum history bisect" would be a neat feature? > > nice one, sir > Indeed. But this should be done on a RPM database copy - bisection should not leave any traces in the history. May be something like yum and git merge? # yum upgrade [...] # yum tag -a my_latest_stable_system # yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing [..] something went wrong? # yum checkout my_latest_stable_system or # yum bisect start > -- > Nikola > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
