On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > > On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF > > > > > > Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future? > > > > > > According to what is written here > > > https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping > > > history function will likely be dropped. > > > > > > From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide > > > history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped? > > > > > > > Hi Michal, > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for > > dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not > > present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back > > in later. > > Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect > many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to > determine exactly what update caused a given problem. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > +1 - I too use the history function of yum quite a bit. -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
