On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:32 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 17:26 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: >> >> Lennart Poettering <mzerqung <at> 0pointer.de> writes: >> >> >> >> > For those too lazy to calculate the difference between 1 GB and 1 GiB: 1 >> >> > GB equals 953 MiB. We hence should probably stick to to 950 MiB as new >> >> > target image size. >> >> >> >> To avoid confusion over units or rounding/truncation (1 GB isn't *exactly* 953 >> >> MiB, for example), the QA size tests are expressed in bytes - see >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size . >> > >> > FWIW, in the Deliverables SOP I've been working on for a bit - >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_releng_SOP_deliverables - I went with KiB, at least so far. >> > >> > (The SOP is still under heavy revision, btw.) >> >> Not sure if it's too early, but keep in mind that ARM images will have >> utterly difference size constraints. > > Well, as I'm writing the SOP ARM is still not a primary arch and so it's > not considered at all in that draft. If you read it, it mentions > specifically the stuff that's delivered as part of the primary arch > release and makes no mention of non-primary arch images. I did, and that's entirely appropriate, I just wanted to plant the seed. -J > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
