On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:04:38AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ok so what you mean is "I want a UEFI implementation that doesn't > > require a Microsoft signature to boot"? The options there are currently > > (1) have a Fedora specific key (which we're not doing because it would > > fragment the community) and (2) ship systems without secure boot enabled > > by default. System76 (and possibly others) will be supplying systems > > that provide (2), so that choice is available to you. > > To me. We all -- and this notably includes Red Hat -- need to work to > make those other systems viable. That goes beyond my own choices. So you want Fedora to boot on all hardware sold? There are two options there - we can sign Fedora with the Microsoft key or we can force Microsoft to change the Windows 8 requirements to forbid secure boot. The second of these is impossible, which leaves signing with Microsoft. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
