On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:10:14PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:45 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600 > > Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > %global commit bd245c9 > > > > > > Source0: > > > > > https://github.com/jukka/pcfi/tarball/%{commit}/jukka-pcfi-%{commit}.tar.gz > > > > > > %setup -q -n jukka-pcfi-%{commit} > > > > I do not understand how this is supposed to work in the face of > > "yum update". > > But if you read his email carefully, Orion isn't speaking about the > version. > So commit will be bd245c9 but the version might very well be > > Version: 20120613git%{commit} > > and as long as the date gets updated, yum will be happy with it. > Also, probably want to keep all of this out of the version field. The Guidelines say to stick it in release. Putting it in Version: runs the risk of upstream making a release like 1.0 which would then sort lower than the date (20120613). -Toshio
Attachment:
pgps8LikMboPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
