On Sex, 2012-06-08 at 11:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:52:30 +0100 > Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Help ! > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > me: I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other > > cases me: like my remote server, where I need to work with vnc . > > > > Kevin: VNC has always been considered a remote session and thus not > > eligible for Kevin: active session ACLs. See e.g.: > > Kevin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711719 > > Kevin: (where the bug isn't really that ACLs aren't given out, but > > that the printer- Kevin: applet reacts to it with an uncaught Python > > exception). > > > > me: Hi, many thanks for your reply ! , > > me: Well how put my vnc with active ACLs ? I need it . ( I have root > > on me: machine :) ) > > VNC simply doesn't get the same acls as a local session. > > I'm not sure what action you are looking for here. VNC have same ACLs as a local session. > I suppose someone could write up how to get polkit Yes, that is what I'm looking for, someone help me out ? > to do that, but as > noted in the bug that may not be a very safe mode to run. > (Then your remote vnc user could access things like webcams, > microphones, etc). Yes, I know and I understand is correct as default behavior, as workaround I also could start a KDE session as root (allowing root start sessions in kdm.conf), but I would prefer use my user configurations. Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
