On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:52:30 +0100 Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Help ! > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > me: I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other > cases me: like my remote server, where I need to work with vnc . > > Kevin: VNC has always been considered a remote session and thus not > eligible for Kevin: active session ACLs. See e.g.: > Kevin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711719 > Kevin: (where the bug isn't really that ACLs aren't given out, but > that the printer- Kevin: applet reacts to it with an uncaught Python > exception). > > me: Hi, many thanks for your reply ! , > me: Well how put my vnc with active ACLs ? I need it . ( I have root > on me: machine :) ) VNC simply doesn't get the same acls as a local session. I'm not sure what action you are looking for here. I suppose someone could write up how to get polkit to do that, but as noted in the bug that may not be a very safe mode to run. (Then your remote vnc user could access things like webcams, microphones, etc). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
