On Jun 1, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Peter Jones wrote: > On 06/01/2012 01:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Is UEFI Secure Boot really the only way to prevent the problem it attempts to >> solve, and if so, what about the plethora of BIOS hardware in the world >> today, still even shipping as new systems? They're all unacceptably exposed? >> Really? > > That's the position Microsoft has taken, yes. Do you share this position that Microsoft has taken? If not, why not? Do you think there are alternatives to UEFI Secure Boot - including a possible spec change? Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
