On 05/31/2012 12:18 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement >>>> >>>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction. >>> That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run >>> the software you intended to run, which is impossible without >>> SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid, >>> the technology is or can be made solid. >> No. The user is not in control here. Microsoft is in control. > Remove Microsoft's keys, problem solved. > Mirek Ah, yes, but then you also won't be able to run Fedora, under the currently proposed solution. Oops! See how slick the slope is? -- Libre Video http://librevideo.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
