On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement >> >> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction. > That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run > the software you intended to run, which is impossible without > SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid, > the technology is or can be made solid. No. The user is not in control here. Microsoft is in control. Try user-modifying a previously approved installation and see if you, the user, can boot it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
