On 05/20/2012 09:49 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
conflicts.
I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file
As long as it gets put into the final RPM in the build process somehow. `rpm
--changelog` is often very, very useful in the field.
+1
It's great that CVS vulnerability numbers patched by each release are
mentioned in the changelog. Tracking it is a common requirement in many
environments, and rpm -q --changelog provides a very nice way to find
out about it.
In fact, is that a policy or just something nice that people do? if the
latter, could we consider adopting it officially?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
