----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > > >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is > > >>> really > > >>> not a good tool for spec maintenance. > > >> > > >> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason > > >> to > > >> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into > > >> %changelog. > > > > > > +1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC... > > > > -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files. > > A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant. > > +1, the changelog is available to the user through an rpm query which > is > essential and useful to covey what has has been done. I'm trying to backport most important changes to changelog from GIT but usually the GIT log is where I look to get the real changes... I understand Changelog has a meaning and it would be really great to have these two in sync somehow auto-magically generated :) R. > Ian > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
