On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: >>>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really >>>> not a good tool for spec maintenance. >>> >>> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to >>> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into >>> %changelog. >> >> +1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC... > > -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files. > A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant. Temporary? git commit messages disappearing is news to me ... One could generate %changelog from the git commit log to avoid the duplication. Needs quite some through though. For starters you probably don't want 'git commit -m "fix build"' show up in %changelog. cheers, Gerd -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
