On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. Much > of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small number of > pieces still remain under GPLv3+. IMO: License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ modulo the compatibility of that combination, which I *think* is OK but I am open to correction: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix -J > What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file? > > -- > > Kaleb > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
