license in rpm spec file for dual license?

["Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx>]

GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. 
Much of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small 
number of pieces still remain under GPLv3+.

What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?

--

Kaleb
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel