Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.5.2012 14:03, Jaromir Capik wrote:
There is. We had to change the name, since the former upstream
is still somehow alive, but not enough to make us happy.

Do we? I mean if the old procps package will be killed in Fedora (which I think it will be, right?) then what you describe could just happen by changing URL in Source0, cannot it?

Matěj

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux