Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MR" == Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MR> exactly, I fully agree. I think, we should lower the barrier to
MR> become a sponsor, maybe dropping the necessity to become a proven
MR> packager first.

I can't quite tell; are you aware that this is the core point of the
proposal I've put forward at the beginning of this thread?

MR> In many cases that is really not needed; a sponsor
MR> could/should become co-maintainer of the first packages of a new
MR> packager.

That's in the proposal, too.

 - J<
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux