Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

That's not really within the scope of the document.  I haven't proposed
lowering the standards for reviewing packages.

I think there is quiet a group of experienced packagers, who do not
consider themselves provenpackers, but who would like to help out and
sponsor people. I know I'm one of those.

Especially with fedora-review as a base for the mundane work, it should
be a relatively easy (and fun!) task to bring on more people.

Using a co-maintainer status between packager and sponsor seems a good
idea to me. It would help in cases where new packagers vanish.

Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux