On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:57:47PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > >>> Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, > >>> you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to > >>> also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of > >>> supporting Anaconda installs isn't required to have them. > >Thanks for the clarification. I just wanted to make sure I understood that. > > FESCo should make that more clear in the requirements but even if > they do they still make secondary architecture solely depended upon > the will and the time of someone within the "Installer team" to > implement the solution required to install Fedora for their > architecture before they can become primary architecture. Yes, in the same way that they need someone in the kernel team to build them a kernel. It's a package. It's under active development. It just needs someone on the architecture to write the code. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
