On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:29:59PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/23/2012 07:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >We shouldn't be promoting anything to primary arch that you can't install. > > Valid point but it still does not explain why FESCo chose to limit > that exclusively to Anaconda and the "Installer team" and their > installation methods or lack there of. ARM is moving into the server and laptop space. There's an expectation that devices of that nature can be installed using Anaconda. If a port is only supporting embedded devices where Anaconda makes no sense then that's fine, but if it's supporting other hardware classes then it needs to have a working Anaconda. I've no idea why this is controversial. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
