On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 15:21 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/23/2012 03:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > >> Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings > >> originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at least what > >> had been done in the past. > > > > 'sufficient' to what purpose? > > To explain the intentional co-notations and if necessary, whose which > were not meant. Well, as I suggested with my personal position in the bit of my mail you cut out, I don't think the proposal to stop doing release names is actually motivated by any kind of worries about the connotations of 'beefy miracle'. I've always thought the names were a waste of time so I was more than happy to jump on a 'no more names' bandwagon when it came along, and it's been stated elsewhere in the thread that those who initiated the 'no more names' proposal are not the same people who were apparently offended by the beef. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
