On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings > originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at least what > had been done in the past. 'sufficient' to what purpose? I'm not against release names because some people are supposed to have been offended by the words 'Beefy Miracle', I'm against release names because they're usually a giant waste of everyone's time: almost no-one ever remembers them, or refers to Fedora releases by their names, so we're going through the time of whichever poor sod has to co-ordinate the naming process, and of the Red Hat legal team in vetting a giant pile of absurd suggestions, for no decent reason at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel