Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:22:38PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
> 
> Matthew,
> 
> Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
> content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
> my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
> "sufficient developer resources" means, etc.

I think we'll want to discuss the documentation and website scenario 
first - I have no idea how well PPC was documented when it was a primary 
architecture, and we don't necessarily want to hold new ones to a higher 
standard when it comes to that. But yes, I'll tidy up the rest before 
the fesco meeting.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux