Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/19/2012 05:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!

Matthew,

Could you add comments addressing the need for documentation and website
content around a promoted arch? And any of the other comments I made in
my previous reply that you would like to add in? E.g. clarifying what
"sufficient developer resources" means, etc.

Thanks,

Jon.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux