Re: End user needs info: Freeplane on Fedora 17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:34:07 +0200
> Johannes Lips <johannes.lips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello, nice to meet you.

> As the maintainer of freemind, I also looked into packaging freeplane 
> but I gave up since it adds a whole bunch of new deps. I didn't have
> the time and motivation to add all those, just for a program which
> basically does the same as freemind.

There are some deeper changes since v.1.2, I guess.

I know that it does have some
> additional features and is a bit better maintained, but this didn't
> justify the additional workload for me.

>From my readings on the Freeplane wiki, the xml format of v.1.2
differs more from FM 0.9.0 xml.

> This is also a result of the way Java projects ship their software
> which makes it hard to use it in a way, we need it in fedora.

Effectively, I am not too lucky with the Open-JDK on one of my
notebook. I must kill the ibus daemon (I learn Japanese), else I lose
keyboard input in the Freemind window.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810764

On the same machine, I tried freeplane beta 1.2, and the CPU cycle rose
to 100%. I don't know if the proprietary Java JRE would fix these
issues? I only use Freemind as Java application

> I know that there were some issues of freemind with regard to
> exporting (which should be mostly fixed by now)

It is fixed in the F-16 package

and with the usage of
> Japanese Letters or Signs, but this is more an upstream thing and
> there is not much we could do about.

Wouldn't be better to orphan FM, and package FP instead? There must be
good reasons if this fork has happened. When I look at the FM bugs & the
feature requests on sourceforge, there is little feedback, for what I
could read.

It's only a question. I don't know the about the FM dev. team. I have
only tried both applications, I read both wiki, and I read the FP user
feedback, it looks overly good.

> The only way freeplane is coming to fedora is that someone steps up
> and does the required packaging work. (Note that I am also not really
> a programmer and was also just an "end user" before I started working
> on fedora) ;-)

I see, so unless you "like it better" for any reason, freeplane is not
coming in the F-repository. I have looked at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package. It's above
my competence.

As someone else pointed out in another reply, there is a FP rpm package
for OpenSuse. Are the OpenSuse packages compatible with Fedora?


-- 
nomnex <nomnex@xxxxxxxxx>
Freenode: nomnex
Registered Linux user #505281. Be counted at: http://linuxcounter.net
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux