Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:

> On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I think "removing the legacy cruft" just for the goal of removing it is
>> not helpful at all and is actually the main cause of "half baked", "half
>> removed" stuff in Fedora.
> 
> Interesting how did you come to that conclusion?

See e.g. how removing ConsoleKit just for the sake of removing it (when it 
had been coexisting with systemd just fine in F16) caused several issues, 
the worst being:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794690
which has now been worked around by disabling the relevant PulseAudio 
functionality. (Not even the systemd author has managed to port his own 
daemon to the systemd API everyone is expected to use now!)

This is not the first time that functionality regressed due to an 
incompatible change which could have been avoided.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux