On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:21:01 -0500 Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > Well, speaking for myself only, I read this as pretty much a "Lets > > begin discussions on it". There's no way a short bit at the end of a > > meeting is going to allow enough discussion. > > > > So, this is just to start the ball rolling and collect feedback from > > everyone. No need to feel bad about not being there to give > > feedback at this first meeting. > > Well, it was proposed as an F18 feature, which _could_ have been > approved at a single meeting. I suppose. I don't see that as likely... > Speaking as a mirror admin (granted of a smaller mirror), I don't have > sufficient disk space for two new architectures (the Fedora ARM team > is actually proposing two different ARM arches). I would like to see > the mirrors involved in the discussion, as there may be other (and > larger) mirrors that won't carry this. Absolutely. Feedback from mirrors and also determining size would be great things to do. > I'm also not really sure what the gain is for moving from secondary to > primary arch. See other posts. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
