On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * #830 F18 Feature: ARM as Primary Arch -- >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraARM (limburgher, >> 18:44:13) >> * LINK: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers >> (nirik, 18:45:42) >> * AGREED: ask qa, rel-eng, kernel and infra teams to provide feedback >> on the proposal. Ask fesco members to come up with critera that they >> would want to add and revisit next week. (+8,-:0,0:0) (limburgher, >> 19:09:50) > > It's fairly disappointing this was discussed during this meeting without > being on the agenda that was sent out. This is a rather large item that > needs a lot of discussion among the various groups in Fedora, and I'm sure > that I'm not the only person that wasn't aware it was even going to be in > the meeting today. (Even ignoring the fact that the agenda was sent without > a proper Subject and easily skipped.) > > It's plain irritating that per the logs, the proposers of this thought it > was just going to be covered in the 'Open Floor' section. Seriously, this > is not the way to start off on a great foot for such a major proposal. Agreed, my apologies. I'm still getting the hang of chairing meetings and only saw the ARM feature after I sent the agenda. I added it to the meeting thinking additional discussion would be helpful, not necessarily that it needed a definitive vote. I'll certainly be more careful all around next time. -J > josh > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
