On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > >> Adam Williamson wrote: > >> > >>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver > >>> against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works > >>> fine if you use a non-debug kernel. > >>> > >> Not really: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751891 > >> Anything dlopening libGL directly or indirectly can still cause glibc > >> errors. Neither glibc's nor nvidia's fix solved that issue for everyone. We > >> still get duplicates of this bug reported regularly. > >> > > Oh, yeah, that one. I *think* the issue the OP was referring to was the > > well-known one with getting it to even build against a debug kernel, > > though. It complains about the license on some symbols or other. > > > > And for anyone interested in the history of 3D graphics hardware here's > an article with a lot of good hardware photos and info: > > http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/graphics_extravaganza_ultimate_gpu_retrospective/ > > It's a couple years old but still good. Hey, that's pretty good. Don't see any big mistakes, and they even got the i740 in there. Solid 8 or 9 out of 10 I'd say. I've owned far too many of those... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
