Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote:
> Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it
> that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to
> think we suck up the regression.

Please do. The current behaviour of tearing down working IPv6 connections is 
just painful IMHO.

> Next up, since AFAIK fdxx:: is a non-routable private network (like 10/8
> right?) should NM say that we're only connected to a site-local network
> here?

That's probably the best thing to do, in both cases, IPv4 and IPv6. What NM 
definitely should not do is say that the connection failed while it's perfectly 
connected to a local network where there is just no link to the internet.

Thanks,
Lars
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux