Re: Review Swap: smb4k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:46:58 +0000, SB (Sérgio) wrote:

> Hi, 
> I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora. 
> I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
> The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
> review , or is already reviewed . 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799651

The package doesn't follow the latest packaging guidelines yet, however.
Could you re-examine sections

 * BuildRoot tag
 * Explicit Requires
 * Requiring Base Package
 * File Permissions

at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines ?
Further items:

> %setup -q
> # Fix pt translation
> pushd po/pt/
> mv pt.po smb4k.po
> popd

When was that fix introduced? And is it still necessary?
The comment could be more verbose.

> %files devel
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> # %{_kde4_includedir}/smb4k*.h
> %{_libdir}/libsmb4kc*.so

Why is the headers dir not included? The -devel package explicitly
refers to "include files". Where are they?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux