On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx>:
>> The lazy answer to both is "fail, or not, the same way as cups
>> currently fails, or not" (in fact, could the session printing service
>> simply be cups that treats the system instance as another remote
>> server?).
>
> If we were looking for the lazy answer, we'd just not bother with queing at all.
Right... I just wanted to make sure that any potential work on user
session printing is not discouraged by adding requirements that are
not currently satisfied with the system daemon.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
