Suggest in retiring scim-fcitx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, all. 

I am maintaining FCITX. Some days ago bugzilla reported an issue to me. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797820 Fcitx-4.2.0 is conflicted with scim-fcitx-tools. I do not want to change anything for Fcitx-4.2.0. I want to retire scim-fcitx. 

Here is my reason: 

1. Scim-fcitx is an outdated package. The source code have not be updated for three years. We could make a conclusion that the project is dead. We should not continue to maintain the dead source code. 

2. A few users are using scim-fctix. Most of users have migrated to iBus or Fcitx-4.x. Scim-fcitx is based on Fcitx-3.x, and it is full of bugs. There is no need to spend time on it.

3. Fcitx is developed rapidly by Weng Xuetian and his partners. It is not a IME Engine any mor. Fcitx is a flexible light-weighted IME framework now, just like iBus. So scim-fcitx should be replaced by Fcitx. 

At last, I am not owner of scim-fcitx. I suggest that Scim-fcitx should be retired. Does anyone help me?

Thank you! 


Fedora && Debian User, former Ubuntu User
My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info
Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager && Ambassador
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux