Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2012 10:53 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 05:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Again, what access do you need and who have you asked for it?
> 
> It's pretty obvious that this is a proposal I made today thus I have
> asked no one for it nor can I since infrastructure has made it clear to
> me when I asked them to fix my user accounting mess that I found myself
> into that they do not handle bugzilla that is Red Hat only territory.

I think you need to ask for access that you need rather than assume you
don't get it because of something unrelated in the past. It is not clear
to me what access do you need beyond what you already have to write a
test script.

> I'm not sure how you do things in your part of the world but usually
> here on top of the world we dont start building houses without knowing
> first how they should look like...

That was completely uncalled for.

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux