Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2012/3/2 Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Be careful what you wish for.  btrfs is not a clear win on performance.

More frightening benchmarks are shown here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FegjLbCnoBw

This does not surprise me. Btrfs has more features than Ext4, so it
may be slower.

If anyone wants Btrfs as default FS for Fedora I have nothing against
- it is a very good file system. For the next few years I will
continue to use Ext3/4 on my systems.

> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_33_btrfs&num=1
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux