phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:33:28 -0500
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/4.8.0

Be careful what you wish for.  btrfs is not a clear win on performance.

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_33_btrfs&num=1

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs
  - From: Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs
  - From: Michał Piotrowski

Prev by Date: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
Next by Date: Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic
Previous by thread: rawhide report: 20120302 changes
Next by thread: Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux